radio propaganda on the radio today a "scholar" (thirty years) of the phenomenon of so-called "domestic violence" and the so-called "stalking" to criticize the government, however, by Mara Puttagna, was invented the latter offense, he complained that in his opinion, after the complaint, the victims would remain "without legal protection and economic."
bono
Perhaps we should remind him that we are talking about the same fucking government that two years ago introduced legal aid to alleged victims of violence (which means that the lawyer is paid by the state even when the woman is rich or complaint for compensation). What
unfair, because it implies that the state, even before it was able to prove (maybe with objective evidence and testimonies third) the accused beyond a reasonable doubt in a regular trial, before even the first investigations can clarify the actual reality and seriousness of the alleged offenses, already considers the female victim (and thus the guilty man) on the word of the complainant (as demagoguery and stupidity chivalrous feminist).
This makes the process more fair because it gives judges the idea that the state has an interest in or who is ordered by the prosecution, which welcomes the acceptance of theses negative accusatory and possible acquittal.
Only through a process that casts doubt upon the word of the prosecution than the defense as to search for evidence to validate one or the other argument (and that certainly fulfill for lack of evidence, and avoid treating both the accuser As the accused as a liar as violent) it is possible to establish the truth, not assuming a priori true guilt. It justifies the short
free assistance with an argument (to help victims of violence) which could be taken as true only after the conclusion of that process that has yet to be performed and for which assistance is sought! E 'circular reasoning.
For all the reasons why someone may argue that a victim of violence should not spend their money (even when they could afford it) I do not have as many lawyers in order to argue that an accused innocent should not spend their own (even when they did) to show his innocence. And since you can not
know a priori which of the two situations may be, or provide free legal advice to both the accusers and the accused or do not provide to anyone who does not qualify for need ...
criminal association female mold (O KNIGHTLY)
Some associations to justify its existence swell the numbers and create ad hoc emergencies.
When the alleged victims do not just leave the "right" to develop according to his arbitrary, subjective, unknowable and unprovable parameters, the boundary between lawful and unlawful, and assert, as evidenced by one word (and the other holding a silenced bell and if he speaks only a priori power worthy of contempt or rice) go so far da formulare domande apparentemente innocenti (tipo "ha mai alzato la voce", "ti ha mai criticata?", "ha mai mostrato disprezzo per le tue opinioni", "ti ha mai rifiutato qualcosa") in modo da indurre le ignare intervistate a dare risposte positive (chiunque non sia vissuto in un convento in odore di santità, ha vissuto assieme a persone che alzano talvolta la voce, che lo criticano, che osteggiano fino al disprezzo almeno una certa parte delle opinioni, che si rifiutano di accontentarlo in tutto, essendo poi il prima a fare altrettanto)
che vengono segnate quale denuncia di "violenza psicologica". E' così che qualche anno fa emersero le "ricerche shock" dell'istat sui "milioni di donne che almeno una volta nella vita they have been abused by males. "By definition vague and all-inclusive (they are equated to the real psychological violence of the" no change of clothes if you break your face "," if you want to buy a dress go get a prostitute, "with calm criticism such as "I preferred you as yesterday," we can not afford too many expenses ") and prepared in advance especially in the abstract from reality and not sighted the comparison / control with the single concrete fact we can say everything and its opposite. Also that victims are mostly men and that the majority of men and women psychologically raped every day.
But at spefico, what would this student? Even more protection for the alleged "sex weak "? Like many of the real violence is not born to saturation of patience after all'ipertutela take advantage of some bitches, mendacious, calculators, treacherous, sadistic (which is given the opportunity to make the life of every man to that of the exile nineteenth-century private family home, stuff, away from their children, destroyed in the affections and social respectability, if not sent to jail on charges false and specious).
Even so, as acknowledged a couple of years ago by a woman magistrate, 40 percent of the complaints of wives, girlfriends, ex-wives and former girlfriends is false. Would the compensation estimate? The compensation estimate foment situations such as the Anglo-American: instrumental to obtaining the allegations of money before the trial (both in case of conviction for false imprisonment are negligible and the compensation money will not be asked back by the associations). In
Talking America is in jail accused by a woman just because she had already done the same with the first husband to get out of financial difficulties.
In England, a girl was discovered (by accident, from cameras, otherwise it would be treated as a victim and would send the boy 20 years of galleys on the word)
and sentenced to 1 year probation (no jail) for having enticed an innocent man to blame for violence then have 25 thousand pounds from the usual association feminine-feminist.
ABSURDITY 'pseudoscientific
Then he said that if "the violence were reported as" the phenomenon would be curbed.
First, we must note the absurdity of saying "with scientific certainty" that the violence is more than those stated when to say whether violence is a serious and real it would be a particular process (which obviously is not in the absence of complaint). Already
with complaints and processes is difficult to determine accurately the actual seriousness of the alleged offenses and especially reality, let alone without complaints and without trial, based solely on plants and aprioiristiche acceptance of the thesis man-woman victim executioner (who said that the victims are almost always women, even when, as in the case of stalking, although the current wording vague and interpretable femministacemente, 30% of accused and convicted are female). In secundis is fomenting the phenomenon of the complaint in advance of compensation and \\ stop \\ condemnation of an alleged violent before they can commit violence (and therefore actually be violent).
TIPPING THE RULE OF LAW
To chase the impossible goal of systematically stop criminals before they commit any crime, be sure to make the achievement of intentions rather than facts (or to stop and punish someone for but what he has done as objectively future / alleged victim would have assumed without any objective proof of this, as is the attempted murder) and the risk of ruining both materially and morally, physically and psychologically, economically and legally, the lives of innocent citizens, or guilty of different facts and less severe than those in dispute, because:
1) the alleged "violence" may not be arbitrary and unilateral instruments of oppression of a mass murderer on a victim, but the means of offense / defense in an adversarial relationship in which each, for interest , tyranny and the rule obtain, use (with a few hesitations, rules and restrictions), the weapons he has, and perhaps where the use of violence by the woman's psychological instead of the physical does not show greater kindness but more treachery, not indicative of being a victim but a different way of being the executioner;
2) whether the definition of "violence" is left to the exclusive agency of the alleged victim (or the subjective , unknowable and uncontrollable outside, the sensitivity of single women), without any obligation not only to translate into practice, in comparison to the other jaw (required to remain silent and if he speaks outlet worthy of contempt or rice), but only objective reference, the numbers may be all the integers from zero to infinity;
3) species within the emotional ties degenerated into quarrels, disputes and resentments, the evidence may be completely invented or exaggerated on purpose (on a whim, revenge, blackmail, for compensation or interest free will to destroy the life of the other).
SPECIAL COURTS
early so you risk the word of the woman, before and even without the third objective evidence and testimony of the alleged violence, of being away from home, children and forced to bear the risks and costs of a process for violence (not to say false accusations of pedophilia),
and the former friend is ready to testify (having seen even a slap), yet to be arrested before the trial.
Want to English law, for which you may even end up in jail as criminals, deprived of all good, any freedom, any hope of social respectability and material and moral support to rebuild their lives, not only without evidence but also without trial?
THE TRUTH '
The 2 / 3 of stalking (as almost all of the murders) is done by men? Ah, well, thank you! I've seen (in my real job when I worked elsewhere from where they are now) so many situations in which husbands are targeted by ex-wives in every way humanly imaginable, live almost worse than the exile century (some sleep in the car because they can not really to pay the rent, many working in jobs with grueling overtime impossible to pay Food impossible, many change jobs and cities) and have to suffer humiliation (public and private) of any kind (by blows which can not replicate to avoid being accused of violence, slander with friends and courts), false and defamatory accusations (of default to violence often have other more fanciful inventions with respect to sexual attitudes, behavior and private events in the family), falsity and malice (against putting children and gossiping with friends, giving her husband the guilt of all), harassment and bullying, sudden and unjustified foreclosures, real expropriation (of cars and houses), and all in a perfectly legal and protected by society and feminist-minded gallant, that even a mild and peaceful man like me (once intimate and wounded in what was to be a matter of sweetness) might turn into a vicious killer.
The psychologists talk about a "very bad drives, but only according to their false (it does not comply nor objectivity does not exist in the emotional sphere or in the intimate nature of the soul that must be considered: the male) and inhuman (because it includes the soul of others) reasoning of a woman. For me it's much worse passively suffer the destruction of their lives (often by those who do what the law and protected by the benefits of gallantry)
I (when I'm not talking in terms of rule of law, but from the feminine-subjective as possible for a man) are for the series: if you destroy my life I will destroy yours.
Women (and psychologists) think they can continue indefinitely to take advantage of a position of prominence in nature (in sex) and gallantry (in society) to inflict psychological humiliation and mockery (in private, in public amusements, in social life), torture and toys for their sentimental conceit, mockery (public or private), deception and outright tyrannies (through the exploitation of the desire) sexual intercourse, without suffering the consequences of their actions because they protected the status of "woman "but every so often (not often, of course) the rope breaks, by dint of pull.
pisquanoidi And some even justify the behavior of strontium (when not hide the reality of what the "vampire-wives" instead painted as poor victims). Why did you kill? Why you mad? Why do they turn violent? Simple. Because patience has a limit: Not all real men are equal in San Jose. Sometimes women think a man to be a piece of wood before you can do anything, or an actor who must play a desired part of others (we are not paid for it as it escorts who have chosen) . Instead we are neither pieces of wood or carpenters. More
aumentaranno laws of overprotection Women's (even when bitch, even when aimed at the destruction of economic and sentimental man for whatever subjective reason) of rape and the rule of law, will increase to more human and understandable (though not always legally justifiable) reaction of most men sensitive and unfortunate.
And this will trigger other draconian laws and other violations of the presumption of innocence and objectivity of the law.
will be a spiral of hatred and suspicion between the sexes. But if any man will open his eyes, can lead others to the rescue, which will necessarily agree with the Eastern countries still not so infected by feminism and the destruction of moral and physical maschipentiti such as strontium (as similar to perfidy and lies to women and willing to protect and justify bitches) who spoke on the radio. Signed
Zabini
0 comments:
Post a Comment