CARE BITCH females who wish to make manifest, perhaps this time someone will pull 'BEAUTIFUL BOMB IN THE VAGINA! Today, driving to work, I heard a radio program devoted to the "reasons" for the demonstration of women against the well-known (but suspected) Arcore events (banquets, escort and companionship).
say immediately that I wanted to be a terminally ill patient for the chance of punishment without any issue to be able to place a window overlooking the parade of bologna and open fire on ex-moralistic troione sessantottino (saving the time because I have respect for sluts whores professional).
If instead of being in a world of sessantottino feminists were found in a world of people like me, dr. Ing Flavio Zabini who is not afraid to sign with the name and last name when he says the truth about what he thinks, were mown down by machine gun rounds in before you can continue to "march" pushing the laws on abortion, divorce and sexual violence, which, as I said already last year (see http://la-sublime-porta.blogspot.com/2010/03/8-marzo-e-parita-di-diritto-parlano-le.html)
have, with their applications for judicial way, destroyed every principle of reason in law, the presumption of innocence, the proportionality of punishment, morality, acceptance, behavioral logic, equality before the law, and, with their effect "social", got behind the screen of a false equality,
to let women (indeed, sanctify travalicanti often with the principles of personal freedom and leading to the "right to make the bitch", to "deceive" to "afford all without having to fear the consequences ", to the injury of the presumption of innocence so as not to leave little or no doubt that the alleged injury to feminine sensibility remain unpunished in the concrete or abstract is not recognized) the ability to exercise without hesitation, no rules or limits their natural pre-eminence in the spheres most relevant before nature, descent, and individual happiness and at the same time to give them equal opportunities precisely because the man had collectively created (the marvelous structure of art as religion and politics as the history of thought as the company calls oppression unjustly one-sided but in fact human and equitable balance in an attempt to influence the world in appreciation social and loving as given to women by nature, so that the man has the same freedom of choice and the same bargaining power of women in the reality of life beyond the social appearance) and individually (to balance with study, work, social position, culture, power, wealth, fame , success, and whatever follows individual merit or luck all that is given to women in power and desirability, from the natural differences in reproduction and sexual love and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mothers) to compensate for this rule.
I only heard a few songs (sometimes I had to change the station to not get nervous to the point of throwing off the road or stop other road users).
WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE "a female figure is still governed by the male gaze, a woman's freedom that is associated with the man to get what want, which ends to coincide with that of granting" You would show that the woman's body was morally justified, culturally and socially encouraged until exalted (as in the depictions of naked breasts in matriarchal societies) is over-aesthetic philosophy of the female figure, or at least raise the possibility of emphasis, on a whim, fashion, vanity, emotional or economic interest free erotic display of pre-eminence, a desire that you have no intention of fulfilling, and when it can finally join just to satisfaction of that desire in the male becomes aroused by it for you immoral, shameful, culturally and socially reprehensible. Asshole!
Mind you that between free and responsible individual choices are not based solely on the questionable morality of other individuals with no right to appoint censors, and the group must turn right to avoid that half of the population live in misery and in ' how unsatisfied the resulting unattainable sources of natural desire.
STEREOTYPE "a female figure, still surrounded by stereotypes of men" stereotype is when you force the escort, systematically portrayed women as stupid, uneducated, lazy, "shameful" for the others, not emancipated, little intellectual or otherwise as "victims of society and people" unable to freely decide the inherently more decent / useful, deny the existence of women are not only beautiful, but also educated, liberated, intelligent or otherwise determined in the free choice of what was seen as more dignified / benefit, which, among other things of their many life, may decide to give moments of thrill and pleasure of the senses and ideas in exchange for a reward worthy of great artists. Denied that they can exist and be experienced concepts of freedom, liberation, culture, intelligence, moral indeed different from that imposed by the stereotype of mainstream feminism.
Maybe you have a distorted concept of "stereotype." Enclose a person into a stereotype means claim to determine its own behavior, his thoughts, his feelings and the whole range of its polychromy of life under a black and white established a priori from a given ideological vision of reality. If we humans want to "predict" the behavior of a woman, we limit ourselves, in the case of prostitution, says to expect the full beauty of the dream that was agreed at the time of payment, do not claim to provide the life and the entire world view of the woman at that particular moment is the actress for us. But you, the mere fact that a woman is branded all over the escort as a "victim of man" or otherwise "not emancipated," no "female subjectivity" and "unworthy to represent other women."
If we then say it all, given the difference in sexual desires love, the descendants of the nature and independent organization of society, are largely favorable to women and those exploited in any manner, time and place, without limits or hesitation, no rules (regardless of social organization), are these men to encasing them in stereotypes use and consumption, for example
the cold mirror upon which
prove the attractiveness of the piece of wood before which all afford (any more or less sexual provocation, to the derision of any desire, any infliction of emotional distress, pain of body and psyche, sense of nothingness before the unattainable beauty and Sendo who targeted a priori can have it all by all and afford everything about everyone, unfulfilled physical and mental distress from sexual to existential)
Friend's ready to do anything for a fan smile
the cavalier servant willing to give everything in thoughts, words and deeds in exchange for the only hope (or held, perhaps in ways seemingly playful and modernized, to make certain "companies" and show some "virtues" to be held worthy to stand alongside the targeted lady is desired in itself),
actor forced to play seducer to please the vanity of the woman or jester (the whose desire perhaps mock) to entertain her,
the beggar at the court of the miracles of love induced, while waiting praying and hoping the "Sportul, watching from the bottom up by her gesture that may depend on the heaven and the ' hell.
We do not create any stereotype, just look for the possibility of a clear agreement and consensus (to get what they feel natural and unquenchable desire to return to what we can offer to which women feel desire and need the same intensity and immediacy than we tested, thanks to his body) in which the "female power" of the body, having a price, also has a (humanly right) and do not limit
there is more risk or pay more for certain, if not in money, at least in time, hard work, sincerity, dignity, performances (if you end up in the stereotype described above) in exchange for receiving only a function of random variable (not so sure of consideration), nor to suffer
sexual treachery, tyranny erotic, sentimental poisoning or mad love from the lady on duty, or otherwise become victims of his "doing the bitch" (which has become costume in places of entertainment such as those working in the meetings short and occasional street or in disco as in the longer and sentimental), or treat with disdain or contempt for anyone trying to open any erotic-sentimental approach, publicly display, for caprice, vanity, increasing its economic value or not for a sentimental display of pre-eminence, its only thanks to attract, deceive and raised in the dream who then want to drop with maximum noise, the suffering and ridicule, desire to spread the onlookers and attract to himself (or even lead to art to come forward and groped approach) strangers who are not interested to know but only to deceive, to hear anything and sexually frustrate, delight, with (s) clothes, gestures, looks and attitudes implicit explicit, eloquent silences and ambiguous words, to arouse desire for art to delight its negation (and like this, especially given mocking, humiliating and painful for the body and psyche with a fine, deliberate and premeditated malice, may be suffering the pains of hell in denial who was first deceived by the paradise of the grant), to attract those who just want to reject those who deceive you just want to disappoint pretending to appreciate those who want nothing but contempt, intentionally attract, choose from a range approach and invite whoever you want and then treated as any one, a man without quality, a simple nuisance, then who is to punch a mere nothing before him and to others, who then wants to call a "disturbing" when, in a perhaps misguided, however sincere, trying to steal the favor, to attract and repel with the intention of inflicting psychological tension continuously, injury intimate sense of nothingness, desire to ridicule, public humiliation and private, physical and mental degenerative unfulfilled if repeated in gliding by sexual obsession and discomfort to the existential (and possibly for the young male, of not being able to smile in sex and to approach a woman without seeing reason of suffering, tyranny and loss of any residual interest in life), use short on the weapon of beauty so in some ways even more evil than women use some brute physical violence).
THE BISHOP "PRIEST infamous" then intervened to tell that a monsignor in his parish, the soup kitchen, the men make speeches with no moral judgments against the feasts of Arcore (such as "Blessed is he who can fun "), while women" would never do this talk. " Of course, the infamous wanted us to believe that this would demonstrate a moral superiority of women (the rest of Christianity is it but the negation of every manly principle of life, condemnation of the animal than human tupo da preda, celebrazione del tipo inferiore dell'animale da gregge ed esaltazione dell'elemento materno-femmineo-moral-pacifistico pure nell'uomo?). In realtà questo può soltanto dimostrare:
1) che la donna è più portata all'invidia (la quale, esattamente come nel caso del cristianesimo creato da popoli schiavi che, con l'invenzione del dio degli ultimi e dell'uguaglianza delle anime, condannano la forza e la capacità di costituirsi in identità di sangue e spirito propriamente storica dei grandi popoli fondatori di città e civiltà, diviene morale e si scaglia apparentemente contro gli uomini che grazie alle escort possono vivere felici, in realtà anche contro quelle donne cui l'età e la natura concedono a privilege of beauty and power, not shared by all)
2) that man is more able to live and let live and not have the will and moral tyranny of priests and women
3) that females have more interest in maintaining Pauline life sexual morality.
WOMEN ARE NOT SURE AND SPEECHES by force, because, just like the infamous priests, sexual morality have in the source of its economic and sentimental value (economic or religious) and its possibility of tyranny over men.
Sexual love is also from the point of view of society, a way to build families and produce millions of bayonets (although let's remember that in worlds "traditional" marriage was not based on something so subjective and aleteatorio as love, but on the solid material and ideological interests of families in generational perspective, being able then to the limit, husband and wife lead separate love lives, as in cases become famous kings, queens, princes and princesses), but from the point of view of nature and also (for the woman I talk to the man certainly) need to satisfy the same hunger, thirst and sleep. The one thing excludes the other, but it is not acceptable that you use the need to bully people.
Man, although separate dall'autocoscienza, has in common with the animals natural needs (the food, sleep, sex), which must obviously be satisfied, on pain of deep unhappiness, frustration, intimate, existential unease with sexual and obsession. All this, because nature does not, in itself no moral value (neither positive nor negative). And it also has no relation with intelligence, with the culture or the personal sensitivity. It is simply pure natural necessity.
If you do not eat you die of hunger if we do not sleep until it decays to become ghosts, if you do not drink dehydrate you like dead leaves. And if it is satisfied from time to time its natural need for beauty and sensual pleasure, life is cut in half in another way: first there is an occasional sadness, a melancholy widespread resignation, then a real pain that starts from the sexual sphere, as fully explained by Freud, influence the relationship with the opposite sex in general and all life (with obvious risk of self-destruction), and with the mechanisms well known in psychoanalysis is bound to burst sooner or later somehow (against self or others). In any case (even without going to extreme consequences) in the long run, you know the unhappiness of both sensory and intellectual, deep frustration, and unfulfilled by mental and physical becomes, if repeated, it degenerates in distress not only sexual but existential with the risk of generating obsession (in which there are neither freedom nor opportunity to act clearly in large and beautiful).
This is the easy gratification and uncorrelated to the obligation to go through the gauntlet of courtship or the noose of monogamous marriage (to say nothing of the obligations "religious"): to be neither unhappy nor bullied. At this
objective data follows the behavior of some "caste" privileged by nature women priests in culture, which bans knowingly create, obligations, "sins", "gallant rules" to make it as difficult as possible or at least " expensive "(in all senses) the fulfillment of this need in order to bully people with it, through repressed desires, longings aroused in art and then convicted, increasing the interest with the allure of the forbidden, artifice, deception, desires unfulfilled degenerate into obsession and especially guilt.
will have a thousand ways to justify this attitude, many of which plans explained by "love" (for the woman or god). In fact they say they do not explain anything, since the explanation, simple and true to what love is natural, is that Schopenhauer (deception as to the nature of man to propagate the species, which concerns the interests of this and do not necessarily even rarely, individual happiness).
The fact that feminists and priests deny it not only shows their total lack of criterion of objectivity, common knowledge, but also their infinite (and infamous) with a desire to perpetuate the falsehood knowingly wicked and unfounded accusation of their tyranny and their arrogance , they are called marriage, marriage, love, engagement, loyalty or sexual dignity.
If you did you would with any other need those "hungry", as you do with the sexual society cristianeggiante gallant and calls him a "feeling" or "sexual dignity." In reality it's just sentimentality at best and at worst an instrument of tyranny, or in any instrument to make a profit Economic Relationship for women for economic and religious priests.
Even religion and eroticism, like everything that has value in itself have an economy (and the possibility of exchange and obtain or bully). What is called sexual dignity has always been one and only one means of increasing the economic value of women's sentimental or make it difficult to access and enjoyment of bellezzza bully the man through the need for this (and women priests are copying each other in this practice).
seldom given, and only at the cost of serious difficulties and sacrifices (moral and material) by man (including performances by the seducer, behaviors jester, jousting, more or less modernized, "fighting" and endurance of pain and humiliation of all kinds) is not a question of dignity: it is a matter of maintaining power and privilege. Likewise talk of repentance, guilt and atonement for those who have simply abandoned to the waves of pleasure and enjoyment without harm to anyone it has nothing to do with morality or the other life. It has to do with what in this life, priests can extort other men believe that they are leaving their moral debt to god that every bearer of habit itself as "collector".
Some women and certain priests with everything they want to increase their "value" erotic-sentimental "or" religious-sentimental " perhaps because they know they have more.
women envious of the intellectual creations of angry priests and sublimated desire for the welfare consequent fulfillment of the desire of the body (men who do not suffer less influence is and deceived) came up with the "sexual morality" to deny to men the sensory and the intellectual satisfaction and works great and beautiful offspring from this.
That man, moved with the speed of lightning and thunder, the intensity of the beauty to be desired as soon as it becomes sensitive to the diverse breadth of feminine creatures (if one hundred women had available, it could generate one hundred children in one year), we can not happy and fulfilled in the sexual sphere (and from there, as mentioned, in all), at least if he does not live in it by de facto polygamous, it is evident in the objectivity of nature (it is linked to the need for propagation of species, complementary to that of selection which is linked to the equally natural female monogamy: the unconscious woman loves being surrounded by a thousand men to copulate with everyone, but to choose among them those who excel in the qualities desired for the offspring), the rest is illusion. Whoever denies this is either hopelessly stupid or as many men as many women perfidious tyrant, or consciously lies as a founder of a religion. The tyranny with guilt after creating mythologies erotic-religious (such as love, marriage, etc..) is the most classic and most squalid. The priests mentioning original sin to make everyone feel guilty and obligated to the suffering and atonement for the simple fact of being born, while the women talk about "uojmini pigs" for the same reason (to make them ashamed of their nature and get it all). And often five-sixths of imbeciles forms the male ends well believe it.
autocostringersi But even if it were possible to live as monogamous, why should I limit the pleasure and satisfaction? Why should I create me pain and frustration? To please the feminists and women-priests?
the illness both! What is the intellect, if not free themselves from tyranny and enjoy more fully and freely as possible, not for autocostringersi. Otherwise, what is enlightenment? Emancipated slaves from the king to fall to women-feminists and priests? But even behead them!
To remain true to ourselves. What is our nature? Disiare beauty with the speed of lightning and thunder of the intensity as soon as it becomes sensitive to the meaning of which is due to sing in beautiful verse and that which is beautiful silence. So what is the behavior that makes us stay true to ourselves? Enjoy the beauty of the creatures in the vast multi-faceted feminine.
Why should we betray ourselves to remain faithful to obligations imposed by the monogamous society, women priests and the feminine-feminist?
to their promises of "happiness" and "love" in this life or the other?
Ahahahhahahahahah (the beautiful rice was never written).
The priests have in common with women-feminine-feminist to ask the time and suffered some payments (in every sense: the material and moral, economic and emotional) promising future happiness (and of course uncertain), the forbidden fruit by inventing increasing delusions, obsessions, desires and temptations (forbidden in words but in fact encouraged) and then steer through guilt, penance and repentance intentions (none is more loyal to the obedience of those who believe you and wants to atone for sin), the creation of prohibitions, restrictions, mysteries from which to make it more desirable benefit and on which base their power (the mysteries of life, death and sexuality), or the possession of certain phenomena and the ' use to its advantage than it really is totally and purely natural, but artfully wrapped in an aura of mysticism, prohibition and sacredness, obsessions and phobias and creates despair and humiliation and supplcihe and tears and follies or even ridiculous and pathetic men kneeling arranged everything.
"does not approve the PROSITUZIONE" (and I believe, break the oligopoly "you women") Then the only woman on the right, before condemning the show to defend Berlusconi (and not the freedom of men and women involved in prostitution that he wanted to ban same Berlusca to please Puttagna Mara), stated "I will not approve of prostitution, I do not think that the choice of prostitursi is an example of female subjectivity. "
Oh sure, when a female subject is a bitch is respectable, and when it gives in a clear and consensual exchange that promises no longer is (although maybe the person is more honest, loving, intelligent, educated and emancipated the world), why so 'doing, allow human beings to emancipate themselves from the potential tyranny of erotic and sentimental other women!
seems to me that behind the use of the term "dignity" to ban prostitution, there is simply no scientific attempt to make it "impossible to determine," but simply "a whim infinite" value (in desirability and power) of what that has to explicitly prohibit the sale (and generalized): The female body, or rather, its power to arouse desire, all to attract and satisfy an unavoidable need for nature (which causes the unfulfilled unhappiness from sexual to existential with risks and consequences of obsession with sexual variables from anorexia to suicide). You want to become short of sexual intercourse as the most sacred and dangerous at the same time exists, the source of all law (from which the distortions of law in its legal definition and application in cases of violence / harassment, with lots of greetings to the obligatory nature and objectivity of the law and the presumption of innocence), the center of every "sacred inviolable", meaning well beyond the obvious individual right to self in the realm of sexuality (which in fact is being denied to prostitutes and clients), on the border with the "right to injure, deceive, mock and bully "Men need through the erotic-sentimental, or with the opportunity to bring to the extreme situation of" sexual monopoly "(at the cost of eliminating or One way or another women, just as prostitutes, guilty of allowing man to enjoy the beauty without going through the gauntlet of courtship, "break" the monopoly).
Your emancipation is not, it's just a form of moral attitude halfway between the Arab OPEC oligopoly behavior, in this case motivated by the intention to increase its economic value sentimental, to afford an exercise in vanity, tyranny and sadistic pleasure unparalleled face and then to make the satisfaction of the needs of natural beauty and pleasure of the senses the most unusual, difficult, hard, arduous, expensive (from every point of view of material and moral) and sometimes even ridiculous, humiliating (when they are supposed to man the jester which recites scorn or the desire to please the vanity with which seducer or when serving as a knight is ready to give everything in thoughts, words and works only for a smile and hope one or even as a beggar at the court of miracles "of love," forced, along with the other while waiting for Sportul, watching from the bottom up, praying and waiting for her from which everything can be given and taken away everything) can exist on the face land) and the schema "Christian" of the ban and condemn that which you want to do especially want (and then, with the need for that and the guilt you are holding the bodies and souls of all men). You
only aspire to become tyrannical man through his need for sex, and call your tyranny "to defend the dignity of women."
demagogic then the reference to "the young immigrant women." When in the West to make carers, domestic workers or nurses are welcome, and are not exploited as they gain such a small village in the western average trades that Western Europeans no longer want to do, and if they decide to prostitute themselves for earn more money it does not go well because most immoral and prohibited without blame for women (which would be politically incorrect) are called "poor" and "victims." Of course, that the associations of prostitutes claiming free decades as the lawfulness of their choice because the freedom has no value for these politicians. Nurses will go with it? Miniskirt for women managers and female students-yes and skimpy clothes for walking at night is not it? But it will be women, prostitutes or not, to decide what to do with their bodies and their sexuality and his life work or private? Or should be, according to a principle or neogiacobino neostalinista, the state having to accompany all from cradle to grave and impose their "virtue" as in any totatlitarismo from Robespierre to Stalin?
political significance "If we want to give a political meaning, then we say that women have every right to enter on the boards of companies ... " As if you were entering the men as men and do not spend a thousand times more or less (more less than more) meritocratic or otherwise random! As if men did not have an obligation to attain certain positions on pain remain lovingly neglected and socially transparent! As if women do not have to nature and culture is privileged to have universal admiration, desirability and social acceptance by the opposite sex regardless of the position reached!
I have trouble accepting that in the free marketplace of careers a woman can become rich and powerful, let alone approve of a law imposing this to some extent even when quantitative and qualitative fortunately not the case.
She already has the privilege of nature and culture, therefore, to be universally targeted lovingly longed and socially accepted by everyone at first sight in itself, the grace, the grace, beauty (when there will makes up the illusion of desire), not necessarily need to show other qualities, make forced other companies to force or reach certain positions in society (which are instead forced the riders, without which nothing that are pure, transparent and socially neglected by ' opposite sex).
In terms of power already has its own way (even noted by Rousseau) to influence things and men, within these roles to their nature and it is not deleted even from the most misogynistic societies (mother, sister, lover, or even friend / confidant) or otherwise in any human relationship is not trivial (in which women's influence on humans is much greater than the reverse), thanks to the men to act on what is most profound and irrational.
Wealth and power are the means by which the human scale (in desirability and personal influence on the real world) that women are naturally given by the difference in sexual desires in love and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mothers (and therefore to shape a soul just now 'born to grasp the needs and desires are also the first cast, to provide social behavior in the infant and natural tendencies, to sign the blank page for the first child of man, then what will influence his inner personality) .
can not be removed to compensate for those who need it to be given to those who can use them in addition to other weapons.
are willing to fight to prevent this.
limits are required for all if you want a form. And a healthy form of civilization and life is based on a harmony of balance and compensation.
We must stop playing into the hands of those who first convinced us with tales egalitarian and moralistic distortion and anachronistic history (consistent with the parameters in assessing eudaemonist and individual reason in the world today and Community anagogical yesterday, in which men had all the freedom to do everything, but the duty to sacrifice his own role, exactly as women), to dismantle all those wonderful facilities (art as religion and politics as the history of thought as the company), built over millennia by the strongest, the wisest, the most brilliant and bravest male followers (Indo-European peoples of the great founders of cities and civilizations through their masculine and aristocratic values) precisely in order to allow men to make up for all As in desirability and power is given to women by nature (by unequal desires and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mother) and then, without hesitation nor limits nor rules, make use of their natural weapons to achieve (always behind the cover of "equality" formal) un'incontrastata most important pre-eminence in the spheres before nature, descent, and individual happiness (this also helped in one way by applicable law against any ethics, any and every nature, as is the case abortion, divorce and sexual violence).
Just because what you say about "weak men" (but I prefer to call it sensitivity the beauty and innocence of desire, as it may result, witnesses poets, intellectuals and the finest delicacies of the most delicate sentimental sweetness) is partly true (and the natural situation of love, in which while the male instinct is disiare feminine beauty in all creatures with the swiftness of lightning and thunder of the intensity as soon as it appears to the senses through the body, according to the need for propagation of species, the female is everywhere feel beautiful and disiate to attract as many possible male, test them and choose those who excel in the qualities desired in accordance with the need for selection of the species is still by sublimation to be the female and the male to choose and decide to follow and work hard to be chosen even if they are not much more brakes and compensation) all those wonderful facilities of art as religion and politics as the history of thought as the company, which has convinced feminist demagoguery today to dismantle in the name of a false equality, and that the strongest and most wise men founders of cities and civilizations have historically conceived, anagogical to measure the ages and not be achieved by his contemporaries nor overcome by posterity, and edemonicamente to have the same freedom of choice and the same bargaining power as before the most important kind, descent, and to individual happiness, did not constitute "oppression of women" but "just and human-offs for the man free and happy."
Just because the woman has the privilege of nature and culture, therefore, be universally targeted lovingly longed, socially accepted for what it is - beautiful (beauty is missing or when the poor make up for the illusion of desire) without
have to show other skills or to perform particular firms (which are forced riders without which they are pure nothingness socially transparent),
the fact that not always have the women's 50 and 50 does not depend on discrimination (such as: "not allow you to do this job because you are a woman "or" even if you do this with the same extraordinary skill and I pay you less because you were born female ")
but from human and desperate man trying to compensate with the study, work, fame, success , wealth, culture, power, effort, merit or luck all that individual (in desirability and influence in the world) the woman is given the difference in sexual desires in love and those related to the psychological predisposition to ' being a mother (if a man reaches a certain position of prominence or social prestige remains neglected by women, because it is able to represent their eyes "the best", "the best father for future offspring, "excellence in skills and qualifying the species for this desirable symmetrically to female beauty, and transparent to society, because it can not even count on that kind of influence on things and on people's own woman, acted, whatever from culture and society in these roles, however, a mother, wife, sister, lover, friend, confidant for over than in men is most irrational and deep and even noticed by Rousseau)
Just because I want to live free and happy, satisfied both the need to enjoy the natural beauty as it is widespread in the vastness of the manifold is in the psychological feminine creatures can choose people with whom to exchange feelings and emotions, the ways in which to interpret reality, the styles that cover every aspect of life, and not be subject
nor, in particular, during the Middle Ages that resid unworthy of a free man called courtship to sexual treachery, tyranny erotic, poisoning or sentimental mockery to the desire by the lady on duty, nor even
life in general, to systematically subject my taste, my choices, my lifestyle, my thoughts, my desires, to my emotions, my feelings, my world view, the Last Judgement of whimsy aesthetic, sentimental, moral or philosophical "female
and do not accept to undergo as you would like to "chastity and obedience" to a self-styled goddess that neither promises eternal life (actually, just to make life
present a series of denials, damnation, condemnation of my deepest and truest
stateless nature of reduction to
of social and individual powerlessness of my every thought and every action I
dependency of all my good and all my bad tastes and whims of the female gender of the lady on duty
of derision to all my pure and naive transport sexual, emotional and sentimental and
of eternal frustration of all desire)
nor treat me as a son (as opposed to dog, or even automatic that no one lover imprisons love each other because they despise him and considers him less and not because they appreciate it and consider it as precious and full of rare and delicate skills that they need to stay in a cage, if not a slave, that no mother would exercise the its authority over a child not to rock, protect, fulfilling the dreams and needs, but to mock, humiliate, coerce, do suffer in body and mind and deprive it of what they desire, natural), I refuse
until I can not have something immediately noticeable and objectively valid as is the beauty with which to be targeted, and longed accepted at first glance and regardless of everything else as beautiful women are thanks to their body, which
balance any report (even emotional) in desirability and power (or even makes it attractive to the woman's case, enough to provide the opportunity for a relationship to one in which solus THEN make any sensible qualities of feeling and intellect but she wanted appreciation of subjective and arbitrary)
feel that women need and desire for strength and speed equal to or higher than those of my natural desire to capture in their beauty and to enjoy the thrill of the senses and ideas,
to have any contact with a non-commercial woman prostitute.
WANT WAR? Only women claim to make the battles remain untouchable.
If I force myself to drag the war in a society that abhor must accept that I use all the physical and mental strength that I have to tackle them.
not have any right at this point to call "crimes of" violence and murder against them: they are, once they have declared war on us, to our world, our sensitivity to our nature, the obvious consequences of ' agone in the fight.
In the fight that everyone uses weapons.
If women are not ashamed to even claim to use it without hesitation nor rule limits the weapons female (sexual treachery, tyranny, erotica, social deception, blackmail, psychological, emotional poison, crazy love) because I should be guilty of employing male ones (plenty of physical and mental strength, to give form to the formless substratum feminine and social order in a world ruled by masculine values \u200b\u200band aristocrats, and affirmed by technology)?
If the weapons with which nature has endowed in the overcompensation of the alleged physical weakness (the poison of love, the illusion of the senses, sexual bullying, vainglorious tyranny, intrigue, erotic-sentimental, deceit, deception, the psychological violence, exploitation conscious desires, feelings and people, the instrumental use of laws and customs, the victim) did not even have brakes or compensation
encouraged by feminist laws and customs of chivalry
to allow impunity to every woman every man
to reduce the figure of the exile century
private family home, stuff,
away from their children, by country, by assets and affections,
sometimes even imprisoned (with false allegations taken as true or useful evidence from the absurd reasoning allowed by demagoguery and stupidity chivalrous feminist, giving the word of the woman's right not only to define a posteriori according to their own subjective criteria, the boundary between lawful and illegal, but equally applicable as a source of evidence before and even without objective evidence and testimony of the third alleged violence / harassment, not to say As the absolute asymmetry which impacts the female-specific sensitivity acts, sayings, or touch-eye is considered offensive and punishable by law justifying revenge wider, cruel, painful and subjective part of the woman and how much hurts - in often a far more serious, as can be observed objectively by the number of suicides caused by a woman or, without going to extremes, the spread between the male sexual problems such as anorexia or early needs of prostitutes-the equally special - and not non-existent-sensitive male-full of such behavior stronzaggine, now rule in modern females, even when they use their hands, and often motivated by arrogance, conceit, self-esteem or need for sadism or otherwise will cause emotional distress-is considered negligible, subject to criminal belonging to normal, or at least tolerated by the "woman's right" and not provocative in itself offensive or humiliating, even As if a man feels, in front of him or the other, feels as intimate as sexuality and may cause injury in trauma, psychological blocks and put it in emotional distress, and then momentary existential) or otherwise forced to endure trials and to give compensation , then the answer
that feminism called "rape" is not a crime, but a healthy brutality necessary to counter lies and treachery (and finally put the knee in a particular type of female deceiving and corrupting).
Even from a moral point of view this is formally correct.
necessary above all to see if the accused is an innocent girl victim of a unilateral, sudden and senseless violence or a bitch who takes pleasure in costume to inspire the desire for art and delight of its negation (and like this, given by a scientific and perfidy pianitifaca especially the desire for mocking, humiliating and painful for the soul to the body and the psyche of the victims, can lead to the hell of deprivation after the promises of heaven being granted) and shows no limits nor hesitation in the rules nor sadistically fun as was his wont consistent use (for vanity, caprice, pathological need for self-esteem, emotional or economic interest-free display of erotic rule) the erotic weapon to wound the psyche of any man happens to the shot.
If the woman is first attracted to art and pretended to accept the involvement, how can he then claim that the uniquely human interpreters subsequent denials as waste rather than sincere and not as evidence of the actual degree of involvement on his part ( since even according to what a man is willing to groped, and resist stress before the woman's denials that measures its attractiveness, the degree human interest and decide whether or not to grant)?
If you have dabbled in the art to arouse desire and then welcomed its negation (and the trauma that a refusal, intentionally made the most cruel, mocking and humiliating as possible, to people who have been chosen among many. And led by all means to come forward only to be subjected to the punishment of hell after the promise of heaven to grant, in sexuality generates more fragile and susceptible minds) because that would then see how serious and "no excuses" man's decision not to stay in frustration? If it was humanly possible to stop in certain situations of sexual or alcoholic intoxication, Why should this effort be claimed as an obligation? Why a man would have to agree not to suffer harm in sexuality who has intentionally injured by the weapons of the same sex?
Why those who have seen imposed by weapons of beauty, attraction and deception emotional tension, injury intimate, derision and contempt in the deep natural self, to the derision of desire, a sense of nothingness, public and private humiliation, physical suffering and mental health, even if unfulfilled, and reiterated the point of obsession by sexual discomfort to the existential (with effects varying from anorexia to loss of sexual interest in each other's life and any lingering hope of happiness, to the possible suicide, through the inability to smile again at the future and sex life or you can approach a woman without feeling like a potential source of injury, deceit, treachery and tyranny of every kind), should not react by looking with their weapons to inflict injury to the other party always in the sexual sphere of gravity equal to or greater?
When I was young I tried also to see women as more rare and precious gems to defend and protect at all costs and rape as the worst violence.
Then, after being treated with disdain if not with contempt by not miss Italy, but the beauty of women less than mediocre,
after experiencing the illusory are beliefs about the soul mate to talk to the poet in the moonlight under the tender trusting, the sad and expensive motion of the heart, the recollection unripe
after touching the hand with the existence of women's sole purpose seems to existential to rouse the desire for art to his denial and complacency then impose such psychological tensions, injury intimate, emotional distress, the desire mockery, humiliation, public or private, all sorts of pains in the body and mind, physically and mentally unfulfilled until to sexual obsession and existential unease, for the sole purpose of its vainglory, of its pathological need for self-esteem, their own sadistic pleasure, emotional and economic self-interest or display of pre-eminence of its free erotic
after seeing them treat man as a mirror on which to test their attractiveness, a piece of wood before which afford all a fool as to go crazy and cruel mockery to deceive and then disappoint, to operate a puppet for fun and then throw at will after derided,
and even heard them say explicitly their role be to use the illusion of beauty as a weapon to make people suffer physically and mentally, to keep them to art nell'inappagamento bodily and psychological, to make them feel nothing before them, to bully in every area, to make their life a succession of mockery of every kind of humiliation private and public frustration became eternal desire of all, to throw them into an abyss of pain from hell after having promised paradise to make it impossible to live their sexuality in a peaceful and fulfilling, and make us forget the smile and the freedom of the day which have not yet loved, to remove them any other interest in life and any lingering hope of joy, and the role of man having
be to accept all this without a murmur, smiling and all work hard, give everything, all suffer for them in the vain hope
after seeing peers not only led to depression, but even to suicide by women whose beauty and whose emotional poison were deliberately deceived and bitten, I gave up any hope of chivalry, I changed my mind, and now I believe in parity of the rapes committed by the brute force and those made by women, with treachery.
is not acceptable is established a right for women to do the crap, as for men (which is not humanly certainly worth less and are far less sensitive despite appearances to the contrary which have been forced over the centuries and educated by society "chivalrous" and women) being reduced to a cold mirror in which to experience the beauty, to pieces of wood before which afford all puppets to maneuver and then thrown away after it mocked,
feeling insignificant before the one that all want and can do everything, to be attracted only to be made to appear before him and the other pure nothingness, to be treated as harassing, annoying or lacking in quality after being attracted to art, to be branded as trivial nuisance after being groped led to an approach, the physical pain or mental suffering as a result of transport to the ingenuous beauty, or even be selected among many to suffer only the strongest deception, illusion more painful than the humiliation deep, being raised for a moment the crowd of disianti, being deceived by a promise of paradise and then sadistically be declared worthless, stupid and damned, thrown deeper into the abyss sempiterda the frustration of all desire, physical and mental sufferings of hell, in the group of those without hope of whose penis laugh, and, if the deception goes even further, being subject to sexual treachery, tyranny and torn erotic economic -sentimental,
causes least damage to the psyche in the long run compared to those who suffered from a sexual trauma that sphere can no longer live peacefully and happily.
Even if we overlook how certain "comporatmenti animals" and some "no excuses violence" may be interpreted as a brutal but legitimate human responses to female stronzaggine **, is limited to cases objectively far less serious, modern women are shown as inconsistent when broaden the definition of violence to come between the "innocent victims". Before state law as consisting in going to a costume on, for dancing or for offices, freely showing their thanks and always inspiring, though, and everywhere, in the bystanders, a desire that can not, at least in those moments, and are therefore satisfy cause of frustration (and potential degeneration in injury intimate desire to ridicule, a sense of nothingness, public humiliation and private, where the lady of the moment is delighted to use all her wiles to attract those who want to reject, to arouse in him through As shown in the eyes of view and those of the imagination, through the eyes eloquent words spoken and unspoken, the movements of the body, face and winks all possible ambiguity sensual desire in the deep just to be able to satisfy its negation in front of him and the world, unfulfilled physical and mental degenerating into obsession, if that is too often repeated, in physical and mental suffering, if refined and studied perfidy is pleased to extend and maximize their mocking, humiliating and painful punishment of hell as possible after the denial of the paradise of the concession, or even if the venom enters the sentimental play, discomfort from sexual to existential variables from anorexia sexual consequences the loss of any other interest in life and any lingering hope of happiness, to possible suicide, through the inability to smile again at the future and sex life or you can approach a woman without feeling like a potential source of injury, deceit, treachery and tyranny of every kind: that is why from the beginning not should compromise on certain behaviors "emancipated" and "uninhibited" anything but morality or "witch hunt") and then complain if someone in a more or less implicit or explicit, more or less clumsy or poetic, more or less involving the hands or intellect, more or less refined or vulgar, tends toward them with transport for the naive beauty and tries to discover their favors.
Unacceptable!
laws systematically detect and severely punish the rape (or sometimes without even before the actual gravity and the actual reality of the alleged violence is demonstrated clearly and objectively measured in practice), but with as many
hardness is not systematic and instead punished the false complaint or exaggerated on purpose (although the crime is equally monstrous to suffer the unjust accusation, the public pillory, the physical and psychological violence of the prison, innocent feel of the world, often friends and conocenti including, as an implacable enemy only ready to destroy not listen to reason, not being able to be monitored and be branded a priori worthy of laughter or contempt, not perhaps have no one outside of the family willing to believe the truth and lived to endure a long process or a long prison rape
costituscono psychological certainly not less severe than the physical and capable of inflicting life, mind, soul and the lingering hope of happiness and tranquility in the sphere daily and sexual damage comparable to those suffered by women actually raped)
for a pat on the back, now take years in prison, while those
touch that means other than hands and able to harass and violate the sexuality in a way much deeper, allowing the girls on peers (causing very serious injury to the psyche,
doing bitches ***
(inflicting desire to ridicule, injury intimate, private and public humiliation, suffering hell of body and psyche, unfulfilled physical and mental degenerating into obsession, if continued,
or in any long-term problems, from anorexia sexual inability to approach girls or even to smile at life and sex
or even discomfort from sexual to existential, leading sometimes even to suicide)
there is no form of crime.
Shame I'm not that I support any action to pay an equal and opposite reaction, are you ashamed that you pretend to themselves the right to strike in sex without it being hit, to wound the psyche without incurring the risk of injury, to inflict (whim, vanity, emotional or economic interest free erotic display of rule) through the emotional trauma, physical and mental implicit in sexuality without having to be able to accept your victims suffer from trauma or more balls in the same .
THE USUAL YADA YADA of the rest (of what the easily heard and imagined) I had already answered.
You, feminist woman, continues to make a speech against nature.
If you ask on the abused argument of the sexual object (already in itself a sham, because, in sexual love, which is nature and not idealism. There is no subject and object, but different actors in different roles, and longed disianti), apparently invented from nothing by feminism for men to feel guilty by their very nature
in every moment of their daily lives, whenever
look, think or reach out to a woman (feeling guilty with the frequency, intensity, and the inevitability of the desires of nature, something so evil that they can not first be conceived even by the most cruel torturers Leninists or the Nazis), then I can at
more forcefully argued that even less pleasant to feel a sexual object (which, however, turn a sincere desire and a real value) is to be treated by cold mirrors in which to experience the beauty, pieces of wood before which all afford (any more or less sexually provocative, intimate any injury, any desire to ridicule, any infliction of pain in body and psyche, of unfulfilled physical and mental the point of obsession, discomfort from sexual to existential variables from anorexia sexual consequences of suicide), from inanimate irons to use without limitations, hesitations, no rules as a tool for every "test-psycho" (which the woman needs for "fun" or to "be sure to have found the right man for the type of report desired, be it a night or a lifetime, at the cost of destruction for one night or forever, the life and psyche of all candidates), any "game of seduction" (very close to psychological rape), of all natural cruelty (disguised as "refined intellectuality female sex"), since in any case insensitive and soul (the same female-female ready to complain about a false history, medieval or the alleged denial of the feminine soul, are the first to be considered insensitive men
whose different sensitivity dare once in a while not only sing with the sensitive and intellectual women, but also look within and discover the wounds inflicted by the hand feminine, and as devoid of soul almost the entire male gender when the woman is no longer functional, despite the male poets of the past, but also those children today, so serious in the creative act of the game as naive in the transport of beauty, and very ready to perpetuate more of the same age in rhymes, philosophy, music, paintings or poems the person As loved and longed to kill or die for it because, if anything, would witness the exact opposite, in front of the people who make purely utilitarian value of the meter of the opposite sex), or (as reflected by your own stories) by puppets (a sometimes talking, sometimes silent) to lift the illusion just to make them fall in disappointment with the greatest possible physical and mental suffering, ridicule, first to themselves and to others, a sense of nothingness before you, and humiliation public and private.
If we want to think in a more profound and real, we must point out that the woman, as subject longed, enjoy the privilege of nature (and therefore also of culture) from the world to be appreciated, admired, longed at first sight in itself and for himself, by his grace, his grace, his worldly essence (when there is no beauty, it compensates for the illusion of desire), without making enterprises (which are forced riders without which they remain purna anything) or other gifts to show necessarily, because the man wants her first place of beauty. On the contrary, because the woman wants to select among the many who wish that he "excels" man is forced to show a certain level, to work hard to compete, to achieve a certain position or socio-economic and cultural prestige, since the concept of "excellence", transposed into the human world, not only has aesthetic value , but is cloaked in a multi-faceted series of meanings and consequences for man implies an equally diverse range of "business to be done."
If you do not succeed, nothing is pure and not only has no hope of being judged worthy of a look by women, but it is completely transparent to the whole society (as in the world can not exercise that influence on people and indirect on things through to what in them is more profound and irrational, that influence the thoughts and actions that difference is just sentimental desires and inclinations of the woman).
For the woman's career is a choice, an obligation for a man. Otherwise he is unhappy, can not enjoy what they need for nature and has neither accepted nor estimate of the opposite sex.
The rest is logical consequence (a privilege, not a discrimination).
That woman proves object of desire is not only the fault of man, but is a fully natural, like flowers blooming, summer blooming, waterfalls who burst, the amorous nightingales singing, the fairs chasing the female in the woods God knows where, or even a rifletterso sull'onon is a decrease in its value (or its "status"), but its increase and its elevation, as the engine and be available to the end of human action (desire This means exactly "voluptas kinetic") is to be placed above the ordinary human.
Whether and how to capitalize on (physically or morally, for vanity or economic interest or sentimental, or for any other reason) this position of privilege (if not rule) is the natural relevance of individual women (which, at least in the majority cases, far from being mentally handicapped, have the ability and the right to choose for themselves what is more decent / useful / correct / appropriate).
Disparities desires (not just sexual) allow women to have the mental clarity and the bargaining power to decide (in and out of prostitution each more or less declared) from a position of weakness not sure.
What then everything in desirability and power is given to women by nature should be compensated in some way by man (with the social position, fame, prestige, success, culture, wealth, power, work The study, luck or merit individual) belongs to the right (and the desire for justice and individual happiness): each man decides how. The
compensanzione of which I speak is necessary not only because, in the case worse, it might otherwise be victims to any attempt at contact with the world of female sexual treachery, deceit and tyranny sentimental erotic of all kinds, but also because if we can not offer anything to the woman of his real interest, nothing objectively valid and immediately appreciated the beauty of (why a beautiful woman would have to settle for the short-lived because it has the consistency of words and emotions and the value and uncertain qualities of alleged momentary subjective no effect on the world?), none of which she feels the same need and desire felt by the man himself thanks to his body, one can not hope to establish any positive relationship with her (nor that of a fleeting encounter nor that of a pleasant life together).
Each report provides a human and give a credit and only the deluded and destructors are convinced of the contrary.
In the capitalist world, lost (I mean as a dowry conference before or social prestige), the warrior virtues of the ancient world and the poetic world of medieval chivalry, the preferred method for such compensation is of course the money, if only because, if anything you think and whatever its position of acceptance / hostility towards modern society and merchant, is currently the only valid value intersubjectively and immediately noticeable, like beauty, with which, therefore, be universally targeted lovingly longed and socially accepted as women are effortlessly thanks to their body (the strictly personal and sentimental gifts, which show only with time up to the courtship, mutual dialogue and introspection of the soul, do not make up anything, because in a relationship that already exists are owned by women, while in a relationship does not exist yet do not have the power to attract those who possess qualities and obvious objective in proposing or accepting a meeting is not trivial, and appreciation of being arbitrary and not universal not immediately obvious, never give bargaining power, since, while the beauty of a woman he knows he can find at any time other claimants, a Man, with its own special qualities of intellect or feeling, can find another lover just hoping to meet another woman prepared to appreciate precisely those qualities and to have the opportunity to unravel with spontaneity and quiet away from the chaos of brief encounters and the tension of modern examination of the events "targeted" in order to be appreciated them for their best).
In light of this, you do well to defer to the sender any accusations of "bitch" in a sentimental relationship with people who are showing interest in the socio-economic rights (as mere attempts to judge the sexist nature with the moral order to blame an entire genre, are worthless, just like those feminists of "pork" to the men want the women moved to first place for the beauty),
do well to label as "arising from envy" male criticism towards women who decide (without treachery or deception) to profit ( economic, sentimental or simply vanity) by the desire aroused in men (God forbid that women were denied to exploit for its own legitimate interests, the qualities they most appreciated by the world, without, however, provide unfair damage to any !), you do well to affirm the right of every woman to choose how, where, when and why people enjoy, maybe just to give yourself (for interest) to chi può portarle un vantaggio concreto (finanziario o di altra natura), oppure (per piacere o sentimento) a chi sa infatuarla con l'eccellenza in quelle doti (non solo bellezza, ma anche forza, cultura, intelligenza, cor gentile, squisitezza d'intelletto, delicatezza di sentimento, profondità di pensiero, capacità di accostare alla bellezza corporale delle donna quella non corporale e non mortale dei versi, di creare immagini e suoni con le poesie, o comunque di perdere la donna negli imperi dell'illusione e del sogno) da lei ritenute indispensabili per un rapporto breve o lungo (ci mancherebbe che, per i rapporti occasionali, dovesse darsi a tutti i richiedenti senza nulla in cambio, o che, per quelli stabili, non potesse selezionare chi davvero appaga il suo bisogno psichico, fisico o sentimentale!).
Non fate però bene a schierarvi (ma forse ho capito male) con la demagogia egalitaria (la quale vorrebbe porre ovunque le donne in numero pari agli uomini,
come se il non avere il "femminista" 50 e 50 fosse davvero dovuto ad una discriminazione contro le donne e non dal fatto che esse, per privilegio naturale e culturale, hanno meno bisogno di certe posizioni e di certe carriere, per essere felici o anche solo socialmente accettate e amorosamente disiate, e quindi non vi spendono tanto tempo ed energia come sono invece obbligati a fare gli uomini, come se il correggere a posteriori per avere il politicamente corretto 50 e 50 non equivalesse a ralentare, for the sheer sake of "balance" in the middle of a competition over who has struggled more and more because he needs to come first, as if the realization of the aims of the Ministry of Equal Opportunities, the situation did not constitute a dramatically to the disadvantage of 'man, and certainly not equal or fair, and would like to have all of the women had the men, as if they would just leave humans free to offset the social situation, as is the case even in nature, as if even at many birds were not the only male to sing when spring opens his breath fruitful, to compensate for the vocal beauty that the female has the illusion of desire, come se persino presso i pavoni non fossero soltanto i maschi a colorare la coda delle sfumature dell'arcobaleno per attirare le femmine, come se quello che in natura sono i canti degli uccelli e le code dei pavoni presso gli umani non fossero stati la bellezza delle immagini e il suono dei versi nelle poesie dedicate alle donne ed oggi non fossero le ricchezze materiali, sempre per loro spese) e la sopravvalutazione estetico-filosofica della figura femminile, incipiata nel medioevo delle dame, dei tornei in loro onore, dei doni, dei versi votivi e dei poemi loro rivolti, e delle servitù amorose (ancora pretese dalle donne in misura spesso paradossalmente proporzionale a quanto condannano il passato quale "oppressione" e reclamano "diritti moderni") e portata al parossismo dalla cultura politicamente corretta di oggi (per la quale tutto quanto è più o meno fondatamente ritenuto maschile deve essere per forza brutto, cattivo, impuro, rozzo, primitivo, violento, brutale, semplicistico, volgare e tutto quanto è più o meno arbitrariamente presentato come femminile risulta sistematicamente bello, buono, puro, raffinato, evoluto, pacifico, ragionato, complesso, nobile).
Poichè tutto quanto in desiderabilità e influenza sul mondo è necessario e sufficiente per vivere liberi e felici, per poter scegliere liberamente e consapevolmente nelle sfere più rilevanti di fronte alla felicità individuale e alla discendenza, per poter avere forza contrattuale in what gives meaning to the existence of a soul is given to women by nature unequal sexual desires in love (in her favor and she exploited in any manner, time and place no limits, no hesitation, no rules, especially in role of lover and beloved above all) and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mother (and therefore to shape a soul as you do with children just now 'born, intuition in advance the wishes and needs, to speak without and show understanding without words, to see how the consciousness of others is still obscure, to read in without being read), whereby the influence of the woman or man, carried out through in what he is most profondo e irrazionale, è molto maggiore di quella inversa (tanto all'interno di quei ruoli ad essi propri per natura e impossibili da cancellare da parte anche della più misogina delle società, quanto in qualsiasi altro rapporto umano),
mentre agli uomini può derivare solo dalla conquista di una posizione di primato o prestigio sociale, o comunque dal poter mostrare eccellenza nelle doti riconosciute intersoggettivamente dalla cultura come qualificanti,
porre limiti all'affermazione sociale degli uomini, creare difficoltà materiali (vedi azioni positive) o psicologiche (vedi demagogia antimaschile dai banchi di scuola allo stile pubblicitarip) all'emergere di una gran parte di essi o negare addirittura valore a tutto quanto more or less widely considered is the right man to propose as a better world, a thought, an assessment of all female
tantamount to depriving people of social and sexual freedom, to deny them any choice in what really matters in life ( I do not want him so much "fuck" as the "feel valued"),
to make them completely stateless, transparent for the world and neglected by women, potentially
bullied (by the most intimate needs and from there in all) and certainly unhappy and
unfulfilled (existentially before sexually) until the
prefer their death to survive in a condition of continuing denial of their needs and its nature, profound mockery of the most naive and true self, of constant humiliation and frustration over sex and eternal desire of all.
That woman is the object of desire is not just sensitive because its is not wanted by humans, not by the company, but by nature omnipotent.
Man can only groped through the study of balancing social, work, culture, money, power, fame, success, or luck on the individual as to the desirability of women in love and real influence on the world is given by the difference in sexual desires in love and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mother (from the privileges to be universally targeted disiate lovingly and socially acceptable as such, by the grace, the grace, beauty - when there is no make up for the illusion of desire, without having to make special or show business skills involving efforts to force, which are forced to be free riders who are pure anything), so too have the same chance of being appreciated, the same choice and the same bargaining power as it really counts most, first to the nature, offspring , self-esteem and personal happiness (otherwise remain neglected by the opposite sex and transparent to society and his life becomes a succession of deception, mockery, offenses within, nothing cuts to the existential and became eternal frustration of all desire).
So in the end is also a speech against men.
Just can not understand that what you are you complaining about is the effect not of discrimination but a privilege? Of man's attempt to compensate through study, work, hard work, commitment, social position, culture, wealth, power, or fortune on individual desirability in the real influences on the world given to women by unequal desires and those related to psychological predisposition all'esser mothers?
You do not realize that if we men had your privileges naturali eviteremmo volentieri di cercare per forza un lavoro stressante solo perchè ben retribuito, di sacrificare la vita alla carriera, di finire morti di lavoro (fra le statistiche che tu citi manca furbescamente quella della prevalenza maschile nelle morti sul lavoro) o in galera per aver tentato di raggiungere quella posizione senza al quale rimaniamo negletti dalle donne e socialmente trasparenti?
Non è la società ad essere sessista: la natura lo è. La società, se amante di quanto possiamo chiamare "equo vivere", può semplicemente tentare di compensare le disparità naturali, o, meglio, dare agli individui la libertà di compensarle.
E' quello che ha sempre fatto il mondo umano before the advent of feminism.
Today as yesterday, the woman always has the privilege of nature to be appreciated, admired and desired for themselves in the beauty (and, if there is, however, given the desire for the illusion). Compensation for natural, man has always been able to bring other qualities to be appreciated symmetrically, according to the world. The world was heroic and Homeric warrior virtue, the world of chivalry and Christian culture, thought, fine arts, knowledge, gentle heart, the capitalist world has the money. Perhaps a future (utopian) finally propose the pure spirit. Today's world, meanwhile, with all its faults, has the money. It will have all the faults but at least allows one to di compensare la disparità di desideri (non necessariamente sessuali) e inclinazioni sentimentali con la donna. Non è assurdo. E' invece assurdo un mondo che programmaticamente voglia eliminare le differenze.
E' ipocrita poi un mondo che chiama svantaggio il privilegio e chiama discriminazione una scelta (dettata da diversi desideri di natura).
Se vige la morale pseudo-cavalleresca, per cui sia per cultura sia per legge è sancito che l'uomo debba mantenere la donna (se questa non ha voglia di lavorare o di cercare un lavoro in grado di farle guadagnare quanto desidera), se anche per un semplice rapporto "free" l'uomo deve dare infinite cose in pensieri, parole, opere, fatiche, dignità (quando deve recitare da cavalier serving) and above all presents and gifts and invitations to dinner, if a woman can get (financially and emotionally, or in the currency of vanity and self-esteem) all for nothing more than a smile, if it is accepted, however, longed or socially valued in every which in itself, as a "lovely girl", by his grace, his grace and every other gift conferred by nature and culture (even when, as often happens, missing the real beauty) why a woman should work hard to get to earn a certain amount exhaustively (as has the obligation not to be a man at all) or reach a certain socio-economic position of prestige (the indispensable man to be rather admired and women who want to be able to surround) in nature since they already raining on her princely privileges (in relation to man), compliments, admiration, and desirability, or at least acceptance, social and nature is given to all?
would be very stupid if not profit, making as possible to maintain and, if he loves the business, choosing a profession for pure pleasure and not for money (and for this reason and only reason that women take jobs for less pay but not the less rewarding in itself).
You should always be the man to "spend" (both materially and ideally) in hope of winning, he must exist for at least the opportunity 'to earn Moreover, else where would the resources for the "flight"? Or to you is natural that man lives constantly unhappy and unfulfilled?
The woman, a privilege it is to fall under both of gallantry, has the possibility, in the sphere of self-esteem (erotic and emotional), to be admired, appreciated and longed at first sight, and that of power (personal and social) act and influence the thinking of men (and history), without having to work hard, make "business" or show excellence in special skills (like the knights that unless the show is neither admired nor longed) or reach a leading position in social and economic (as men without it count for nothing).
And all this is true of nature, as is the male to be caused by nature in spite of dangers and hardships to follow the female in the densest forests and who knows where, not vice versa.
That difference must be compensated in one way or another by the social order. The money is half (or half the current).
If people are vacated this "rebalancing" is free of discrimination, not because of bans or disadvantages for women, but the consequence of several free choices dictated by different needs, different natural inclinations and talents. And 'if you seek to eliminate post such rebalancing is accomplished action unjust and discriminatory in that equality imposta penalizzerebbe gli uomini DATO CHE il non avere il femminista 50 e 50 non deriva da discriminazione contro le donne ma dal fatto che esse (per privilegio naturale e culturale) hanno meno bisogno di certe posizioni e di certe carriere (per essere felici o anche solo socialmente accettate e amorosamente disiate) e quindi non vi spendono tanto tempo ed energia come sono invece obbligati a fare gli uomini: conseguentemente correggere a posteriori per avere il politicamente corretto 50 e 50 sarebbe come, per il puro gusto di "pareggiare", rallentare a metà di una competizione chi ha corso e faticato di più perché aveva più necessità di arrivare prima.
Se davvero si realizzassero i propositi del ministero delle pari opportunità la situazione would be entirely at the expense of man, and certainly not equal or fair.
Desire is odd.
She enjoys a privilege in the sphere, we say, erotic-sentimental, which is derived directly from nature. This position of privilege (or, if you will, a world leader) spreads its effect, directly or indirectly (and in an absolutely independent social organization, which can not, even if you like, win this nature), and in every aspect of life since, as Freud shows, all that we desire or want, consciously or not, comes from the depths of sexual impulses. Of what we can not ignore talking about "equality" as long as it is for the purpose effectual equal or better, an equal opportunity to every person to seek the way to be happy, unhappy or not possible, according to their own highly personal and ingiudicabili parameters. Otherwise it means either that you are too stupid to understand the essence of the problem beyond the appearance or too treacherous and false to admit to having an advantage (much more influential men of superior physical strength) which must be offset by a society that I do not say should be right, but at least working (just as it is balanced, as it was the world of tradition, can run long). The third way is simply considered acceptable only because of the cruelty of nature in questo caso va (o sembra andare) a vantaggio della donna, sottendere che l'uomo debba sempre essere tiranneggiato o reso profondamente degno del riso da questa e definire arbitrariamente la disparità naturale come "giustizia naturale" (ragionamento tipico delle ecofemministe: e sarebbe interessante la loro reazione a chi sostenesse giusto per l'uomo approfittare della brutalità fisica e delle forze naturali di coesione , ossia del branco, per schiavizzare le donne, perché è il discorso simmetrico a questo quello sostenuto da certe ecofemministe e da certe donne).
Rousseau credeva ingenuamente tale influenza delle donne (esercitata per mezzo di ciò che nell'uomo è di più profondo e di più irrazionale) un fatto positive as natural, but Leopardi and Schopenhauer have amply demonstrated how little the nature of happiness or unhappiness amounts of individuals.
Happiness is a speculative concept and infinitely subjective in its ability (or, for the pessimists, illusory in its impossibility), and is not reached with the pure satisfaction of the body, but when that is objectively verifiable can not be fully satisfied the needs natural (including, for humans, those of beauty and pleasure of the senses as of ideas), the living entity with self-consciousness is inevitably unhappy.
This is inhuman not want to allow the man to be able to compensate for the situazione svantaggiata di partenza o lamentarsi delle conseguenze macroscopiche di ciò (vedi statistiche sui redditi), ovvero di come a volte l'uomo (non tutti sono imbecilli come sembra) vi riesca con le proprie forze (lavorando e guadagnando di più, sacrificandosi di più nella carriera perché non ha altra scelta).
Se una donna può avere la bellezza per essere apprezzata, ammirata, disiata al primo sguardo, un uomo deve poter acquisire altre doti parimenti oggettive e immediatamente apprezzabili per essere allo stesso modo ammirato e disiato e "pareggiare il rapporto" con la bella donna.
Se ella possiede la bellezza, di cui, sensitivamente e intellettivamente, l'uomo ha naturale ed intimo bisogno e verso cui è mosso da profondo e immortale disio, egli deve possedere e poter offrire a lei altre doti di cui la donna ha pari bisogno e brama e verso le quali è mossa a desiderio con ugual forza.
Ogni rapporto umano, fra uomo e uomo o fra uomo e donna, è fatto di dare ed avere (non necessariamente e banalmente in senso economico, ovviamente). Solo gli stolti possono credere il contrario e confidare nella gratuità (la quale non esiste neppure nel sentimento).
I rapporti fra uomo e donna nel regno dei cieli non mi interessano. Io parlo di quanto accade sulla terra. E' raro si incontrino San Francesco e Santa Chiara e poiché l'uomo deve poter godere realmente, di quando in quando, delle bellezze che abitano la terra, deve anche possedere quelle qualities that can realistically have to attract and enjoy real women before the saints.
If you do not have these qualities have nothing concrete to offer to the woman and she longed for and appreciated, so can not establish any positive relationship with her. And the man most likely will be unhappy and unfulfilled and sensitively both intellectually as well as ever popular with both destructive and self-destructive consequences.
possible that Lauer and intelligent women do not understand these simple truths?
are sperm that have to run the egg, not vice versa. Can not be "slowed" to "equality." And I'm male animals who have to fight, chase and reach and conquer the animal female who stands firm and has no obligations. And for running, chasing, competing, you need the gas, the strength, confidence. And the fuel, strength, confidence, in a capitalist world, living in economic opportunities. Foolish to deny it. And then deny that the current situation is not motivated by discrimination, but men of desperate attempt to compensate for the natural privilege of women is to be cynical and coffins. In addition to FALSE!
